Part one
The period of
the recent past has been characterized by significant t development in the
global economies. Some of the factor that has enhanced the realization of these
developments is the attributes of technological advancement, globalization and
international trade. Because of the unifying factors of the global economies,
the disparities in some of the leading economies have been spread to the other
economies because of the regional integration. Financial crisis is one of the
adverse aspects that have been shared between various global economies. In
reality, the aspects of financial crisis are detrimental for the realization of
economic growth and the European Union have engaged the corrective measures to
ensure that these detrimental attributes are handled in the economy (McDonald,
Frank and Dearden, Stephen, 2012). The establishment of the European Monetary
Unification Stability Pact has been of immense benefit because it has enhanced
unification of 27 European states with the aim of enhancing economic
development and stability amongst the member states (Artis & Winkler, 2009,
Collignon, 2003). the results from the research work
conducted has revealed that the formation of the European Monetary Unification
Stability Pact is based on the realization of two incentives and these includes
preventing the occurrence of crisis in the economy and correcting the
disparities in the economy. Certainly, the preventive arm has the function of
ensuring that the aspects of fiscal policies are stable and sustainable thereby
enabling development of the economy (European Commission, 2012). On the other hand,
the corrective arm seeks to establish the framework for the affected economies
with higher debts and excessive deficit to correct their economies. The
policies enacted by the European Union have had significant impact on the
performance of the member economies because they have results in the changes of
structural performance and adjustments with the aim of increasing their growth
prospective.
The economy of Greece is one of the leading economies in
the European Union that has experienced the adverse effects of debt crisis. The
debt crisis that adversely affected the functionality of the Greece economy has
been attributed to have been caused by the structural weaknesses in the Greek
economy and this coupled with the elements of incomplete tax policies, banking
unification with other European countries and the usage of the euro as a
universal currency for the European nation (Coricelli & Valerio, 2002, DeGrauwe, 2000, Deroose,
Servaas, Sven Langedijk & Werner, 2004). The collapse of the
financial institution in the Greek economy was an indication to the other
European players about the emergence of financial crisis and corrective
measures had to be initiated. Over the period, the roles of the European Union
had been to ensure economic prosperity of the member states and this is done by
ensuring that the disparities in the economies are eliminated. This is achieved
through the use of factors like debts and debt crisis.
Debt
and debt crisis
National debts have been described as the debts owed by
central governments and it represents one aspect of government funding (Feldstein, 2003).
The EU has identified this aspect as the medium term budgetary objective and it
is defined in structural terms. The member states of the EU are required to
submit their medium-term budgetary plans in stability and convergence programs
and these are submitted for assessment towards enhancement of fiscal
sustainability of the European Union members.
On the other hand, debt crisis is used to refer to the
aspect of proliferation of huge debts relative to the revenues derived from
taxation. Debt crisis is significant increasing capacity of the government to
default in the payment of its debts. The European Union has developed a step by
step guide towards restoration of debt crisis through the development of the
corrective arm of the EU stability pact (European Commission, 2012).
Greek debt crisis
Over
the period, the Greek economy has continued to suffer because of the attributes
of debt crisis and this has adversely affected the entire European Union because
Greek is one of the 27 members of the union. In this regard, the combination of
the EU have implemented corrective measure in the Greek economy and these
includes the provision of emergence funds to restore financial performance
through offset of debts and the enhancement of the call to implement austerity
measures. Austerity measures are highlighted by the European Monetary
Unification Stability Pact as the crucial aspect of restoring economic performance
when the economy is faced with adverse measures (Jonung, Lars & Martin, 2004, Kenen, 2000, European
Commission, 2012). The EU stated that austerity measures
would raise competitiveness and global participation. In addition, the EU also
advocated for the raise in revenue through the implementation of strong
taxation policies and these measures proved beneficial for the Greece economy
resulting in growth. In view of the above provisions, it is evident that the
factor so the European Union had significant contribution towards the
restoration of the performance of the Greek economy and this was achieve
through the implementation of the European Monetary Unification Stability Pact.
Part
two
The establishment
of economic stability of the member states is one of the objectives of the
European Union. In a bid to enhance performance of the European Union economies,
the union has established the European Monetary Unification Stability Pact
which has stipulation of providing steps towards the restoration of the poorly
performing economies. Certainly, the usage of this criterion has been of
immense benefits to the Greece economy because it has enhanced its performance
and development. The implementation of this has been achieved through the
establishment of various strategies and incentives. One of the strategies
highlighted in the pact is the offering of financial assistance and this is
done in various phases. In this regard, the establishment of the fourth funding
incentive in the economy of Greece was with the consideration of various
incentives. The restoration of sharp deterioration of the financial performance
of Greece economy was one of the objectives that prompted the fourth finding
program. Restoration of fiscal sustainability in Europe is an ideal incentive
that is crucial for development and it has the consideration of enhancing
development (Rose, Andrew,
2000).
Another objective that prompted the proponent of forth funding program was the
need to implement structural reforms in the economy. Implementation of structural
reforms is a beneficial incentive because it has the attribute of improving the
competitiveness of the economy thereby leading to the increased global
participation (Stark,
Juergen, 2001). Global participation is extremely beneficial for
the national economy because it enhances globalization and sustainability in
economic growth.
Over the period, the European Union has been on the fore
front in ensuring that the establishment of the member economies is significantly
enhanced and this has been achieved through the provision of both structural
assistance and financial assistance. Analysis conducted on the Greece economy
has revealed that the European Union initiated series of funding program and
the consideration of the forth funding program is the latest scheme of
financial assistance accorded to the economy (Wyplosz, 2005). In view of this, the
elements of fourth funding program shows the approval of the financial
assistance of the Greece economy by the euro area minister. Results have shown
that the IMF and the euro area member states committed to the provision of
Greek loan facility and an additional €130 billion to aid the development of
the Greece economy (Stark,
Juergen, 2001, European Commission, 2012). During the release
of these funding to the Greece economy, the attributes of evaluation will be
based on the observation of quantitative performance criteria and the positive
evaluation of the progress made in the economy. The disbursement of the
economic development funds were conducted on different periods as shown in the
table below.
Disbursement
|
Date
|
EFSF
|
IMF
|
Total
|
1
|
March – June 2012*
|
74
|
1.6
|
75.6
|
2.1
|
December 2012**
|
34.3
|
-
|
34.3
|
2.2
|
January 2013***
|
7.2
|
-
|
7.2
|
2.3
|
Jan-13
|
2
|
3.24
|
5.24
|
2.4
|
Feb-13
|
2.8
|
-
|
2.8
|
The economy has
continued to receive immense funding initiative from the European Union this
has resulted in the rejuvenation of the economy as shown by the increase in the
aspects of growth. The funding to the economy has resulted in the development
of structural programs and the strengthening of the tax provisions in the
economy. This has the impact of generating jobs to the economy and increasing
their national income. It is projected that the economy will generate a more
than 147,000 jobs for their citizens over the seven year period (Thom, 2003, von Hagen, 2008).
Other evidence from the economy has depicted reduction in the countries debt a
margin of 3.8 to 5.5% and this is extremely beneficial as it highlights development
of the structural programs and implementation of developmental polices (McDonald,
Frank and Dearden, Stephen, 2012). Finally, the implementation of the forth
founding incentives has been of immense benefits to the economy because both objectives
of the fourth funding have been realized in the economy and mild economic
growth restoration has been enhanced.
References
Artis, M.J. and B. Winkler (2009):
“The Stability Pact: Safeguarding the credibility of the European Central
Bank,” Centre for Economic Policy Research, London,
Collignon, Stefan (2003): “Is Europe
going far enough? Reflections on the Stability and Growth Pact, the Lisbon
strategy and the EU’s economic governance”, in: European Political Economy
Review 1 (2).
Coricelli, Fabrizio and Valerio
Ercolani (2002): “Cyclical and Structural Deficits on the Road to Accession:
Fiscal Rules for an Enlarged European Union”, in: CEPR Discussion Papers No.
3672.
DeGrauwe, Paul (2000): Economics of
Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deroose, Servaas, Sven Langedijk and
Werner Roeger (2004): “Reviewing adjustment dynamics in EMU: from overheating
to overcooling”, in: EU Economic Papers No. 198 (January 2004). Eichengreen,
Barry (2004): “Institutions for Fiscal Stability”, in: CESifo Economic Studies
50 (1), pp. 1-25.
European Commission (2004) “Cyclical
Convergence in the Euro Area: Recent Developments and Policy Implications”,
Quarterly Report on the Euro Area3(2): 27-38.
Feldstein, M. (2003): “The political
economy of the European Economic and Monetary Union: Political sources of an
economic liability,” Journal of Economic Perspectives
Jonung, Lars and Martin Larch (2004)
“Improving Fiscal Policy in the EU: The Case for Independent Forecasts,”
Economic Paper No. 210, European Commission.
Kenen, Peter (2000) Economic and
Monetary Union in Europe, Cambridge University
McDonald,
Frank and Dearden, Stephen. European Economic Integration, Prentice
Hall, ISBN: 0273679082, the latest edition.
Rose, Andrew K. (2000) “One Money,
One Market: The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade”, Economic Policy30.
Stark, Juergen (2001) “Genesis of a
Pact”, in: A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.), The Stability and Growth
Pact, Palgrave: 77-105.
Thom, D.R. (2003): “Economic and
monetary union,” Centre for Economic Research,
University College Dublin, Working
Paper 97/3, January.
von Hagen, Juergen (2008) “Currency
Union and Fiscal Union: A Perspective From Fiscal Federalism”, in: P. Masson
and M. Taylor (eds.) Policy Issues in the Operation of CurrencyUnions,
Cambridge University Press.
Wyplosz, Charles (2005) “Fiscal
Policy: Institutions Versus Rules”, National Institute Economic Review91:
70-84.
No comments:
Post a Comment