Government Mental Health Policy
Discussion
Over a period of
time, external knowledge acquisition has proved to be a pillar of success to
organizations in their various fields of operation. Knowledge transfer involves
activities of exchanging of external knowledge between two entities where one
receives and applies the knowledge given for personal gain (Kumar and Ganesh,
2009). Knowledge translation is meant to synthesize, disseminate, equip and
transfer knowledge to the healthcare personnel and assist them in their daily
execution of the health policies.
From the results obtained, it is
evident that there is lack of knowledge transition activities in the mental
healthcare sector. This means the policy makers are not involving the
researchers in the acquisition of interactive data that could assist in proper
service delivery to the mental patients.
The finding of
this review scope on the use of knowledge translation in the government mental
health policy, reveal that there is little literature about the use of
knowledge translation policies in the government mental health sector and other
health care areas of Canada and other parts of the world. This translates to
the fact that there is little usage of knowledge among the health care and
other sectors. Cummings and Teng, (2003), found out that knowledge transfer as
other areas of success can be evaluated through the number of publications at a
given period of time, Looking at the results reveal that there is little
information on the subject matter of KT shown by the few publications that have
the KT policy framework.
The basic
understanding of the knowledge transferred by the user and its application to
bring out the results may prove difficult to the end user to absorb and utilize
the information. (Tsang, 2002).
The results reveal
that there is a lot of information among the people that has not been utilized
in the mental health sector. This means the service providers and the policy
makers are working in isolation thus fail to disseminate the information to the
end users. This has been shown by the few (one) publication within Canada. The
KT key activities used by the healthcare department in policy makers do not
include the knowledge translation guidelines and framework.
According to Harman, C, Brelade, S. (2003), the various gaps in the
study finding clearly separate the knowledge disseminator, the health care
policy makers and the stakeholders, the care givers and the patients who
experience the mental illness. The few published works in the area of mental
heath reveal the fact that the recipient of the knowledge and information
either does not absorb and or do not understand the usage of the information. The
gaps in the study findings could be eye opener to the challenges faced during
the implementation of the KT policies and activities. These challenges include
lack of a shared common language among the policy makers and researchers who
have the capacity to find the evidence based knowledge to be used in the
effective treatment of patients. Trautman and Steve (2006)
There is a failure by the
government to develop a cumulative evidence base for the knowledge transfer
that can be shown with only one publication in Canada which involves the use of
research and knowledge transfer framework. The government has not set aside
funds for the scientific explorations in the area of knowledge transfer thus there
is no link between the researcher and the end user. Davenport et al (2000) noted that in such research
review, the government needs to create a sustainable programme in training
initiatives of the researchers to enable introduction of knowledge based treatment
to the patients.
Implications and recommendations
The study found out that there are
an increasing number of patients with mental problems yet the government has no
clear policies to offer treatment to the people by use of knowledge based research
and transfer. Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995) argued that
the parallel working of the stake
holders, policy makers, researchers, care givers and the patients with
experience, means that patients receive low quality treatment. The government
therefore needs to fast track its activities and set up a comprehensive
initiative that will enable researchers to carry out there activities of
knowledge search effectively. This can be done by setting aside funds to assist
researchers during the research period. Similarly, the sensitivity and
importance of this research calls for the government to offer good remuneration
to the scientists to act as a motivation factor.
The government through the health
officers and health policies should show an interest in the integration of the
knowledge search and transfer activities in their programmes. This will give
the researchers motivation to continue with the research since there efforts
are being appreciated. There is need to carry out a research in all involved
sections to ascertain the missing link in the use of knowledge transfer policy
and framework. It is possible the policy makers are in need of the research
findings but the scientists are not doing the research.
Conclusion
This study and review scope was
meant to show that extend of use and application of knowledge transfer in the
healthcare sector system. From the research and its findings, there is lack of
a knowledge base and knowledge transfer framework policy in the health sectors
of most countries. This has also revealed the various gaps in the application
of knowledge policies in the most sectors of the health care.
References
Argote, L. et
al. (2000). "Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others", Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1)
(May): 1–8.
Cummings, J and Teng, B. 2003.
‗Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer successes. Journal of Engineering and
Technology Management. 20: 39–68
Davenport,
Thomas H.; and Prusak, Laurence (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know,
Boston Massachusetts, Havard Business School
Press.
Davies.
H.T.O., Nutley, S.M., & Smith, P.C. (Eds.). (2000). what works? Evidence based policy and practice in public
services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press
Davis, P.,
& Howden-Chapman, P. (1996). Translating
research findings into health policy.
Social Science & Medicine, 43 (5), 865-872
Harman, C.; Brelade, S. (2003). "Doing the Right Thing in a
Knowledge Transfer". Knowledge
Management Review (Melcrum Publishing) 6 (1): 28–31.
Kumar, J. and Ganesh, L. 2009.
‗Research on knowledge transfer in organizations: a morphology‘. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4):
161-174.
Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating
Company. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Trautman, Steve (2006). "Teach
What You Know: A Practical Leader's Guide to Knowledge
Transfer", Addison-Wesley
Tsang, E. 2002. ‗Acquiring knowledge
by foreign partners for international joint ventures
in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing
and learning myopia‘. Strategic
Management Journal, 23, 835-854.
No comments:
Post a Comment