ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY
Organizational
theory and perspectives
Over
the period, the global regime has witnessed the emergence of significant
technological advancement and national development. In the wake of these
developments, various organizations have emerged to facilitate provisions of
various commodities in the economies. The management of the organization can be
a daunting tasks and this call for the usage of policies and theories.
Normally, the aim of establishing an organization is to help it realize the
goals and objectives that are established during the formation and because the
realization of these attributes leads to the establishment of stakeholder
welfare development and establishment of the social welfare and social
responsibility (Shafritz, Ott & Jang, 2011). In this consideration, the
usage of ideal theories has been enacted to enhance the management of the
organization in making the choices. Organizational theories highlights the
system of theories that aide in the organization is the consideration the daily
aspects of management by highlighting the step by step towards development.
Some of the theories adopted by organizations have been stated as the theories
of Modernism, Critical theory, symbolic interpretation and finally,
postmodernism theory. Similarly, the consideration of management of the
organization is also based on the consideration of perspectives. Analytical
reports have stated that organizational theories help in the studying the organization
with the aim of identifying the credible attributes of solving the problems,
increasing productivity, maximizing efficiency and finally with the aim of
enhancing an increase in the needs of the shareholders (Dubé
& Robey, 1999, Ford, Connelly & Meister, 2003). In the consideration of
analyzing organization theory, various aspects of perspectives have been used
to enhance understanding of the organization. Generally, the usage of multiple
perspectives has the effect of enhancing performance because it enhances the
attributes of increasing the understating of the organization. The perspectives
that are generally used in the consideration of organizational theory
constitute classical perspective, neoclassical perspective and environment
perspectives. Analysis conducted across the global divide has suggested that
some organization have adopted the act of incorporation multi-perspective
approach to enable them understand the organizations.
The
attributes of multi perspective approaches have been of immense help in the
aspect of helping the stakeholder to understand the proximities of the
organization. These approaches have
received significant approval in the recent past because they help in the
aspect of understanding the organization from various angles thereby enhancing
the chances of improving the performance of the organization. The proceeds of
multi perspective have enhanced development of the organization because it has
the attribute of emphasizing on the establishment of the efficiency and the consideration
of the mechanical attributes of the organization and they have the consequences
of helping in the establishment of performance (Galliers, Madon, &
Rashid, 1998, Saussure, Ferdinand, 1959, Bakhtin, Mikhail, 1981). Analysis of the statistical
findings has shown that multi perspective approaches have the provisions based
on the considerations of modernism theory, post modernism, symbolic
interpretation and critical theories.
Modernity
perspective and theory is crucial in enhancing development the organization
because they encompass the consideration of the factors that have enhanced
development in the organization. This theory seeks to ascertain the factors
that contribute to the transformation of the organization from the agrarian
period to the modern period. The term can be used to included the aspects of
industrialization and the changes can be wetness through the variations in the
representation of the social structures. This system of perspective is normally
preferred because it incorporates ideal practices from the past regime of
management and incorporates that into the modern depiction of management. Even though this depiction has been adopted
because of its aspects in enhancing organizational development, the consideration
of the attributes highlighted by this perspective has their sources in the
western world and thus do not provide ideal incentive for development. Modernization
theories have also been criticized because they only analyze internal factors
while neglecting external factors that may have significant influence.
The
consideration of the disparities and the critics charactering the usage and
development of modernism theory necessitated the formation and establishment of
postmodernism. In this regard, post modernism was largely based on the
consideration of the attributes and depictions of modernism theory (Lash,
Scott, & Urry, 1987, Boulding, 1956, Simon, 1957). Furthermore, postmodernism
represents the consideration of the reactions towards the considerations of
establishments in the aspects of culture, literatures, economics and
philosophies that are concerned with the consideration of organizational
theory. With regard to the development of post modernism development, the
development of the postmodern theory has the aspect of enhancing crucial
development of the theory thereby rectifying the disparities facing the theory.
In this regard, the theory is amended to suit the consideration of the internal
and external factors that affect the operations of the organization. The
conduction of this amendment s has ensured that the organizational factors
continue to be enhanced and this leads to a clear understanding of the organization
thereby enhancing the consideration that multi perspective approach is adopted.
The
consideration of critical theory is another important aspect that forms an
integral part of the multi perspective and has been on the fore front in the
analysis of the organization. The critical theory is based on the aspect that
reflective assessment and critique of the society and cultures adopted because
these are ideal in enhancing the performance of the organization. The basis of
this theory is aimed at enhancing the usage of knowledge gained from social
sciences and humanities to critically evaluate the provisions of critical
theory. Over the period, the attributes of the theory of criticism has been
used to describe implication of measure that are aimed at liberating the organization
form the matters that enslave the organization thereby preventing the
organization form reaching its goals. In the view of these revelations,
embodying this perspective into the consideration of the multi perspective is
beneficial for the enhancement of organizational performance.
Finally,
the consideration of symbolic interaction theory also forms ideal incentive in
the incorporation of the multi perspective management of the organization. According
to this theory, people act based on the symbolic meaning they find within the
environment and any situation. In this attribute, people interact with the
symbols and establish relationship with them and normally, the goal of the
interaction with one another is to create a share opinion and meaning. In
reality, language is also classified as a symbolic form used to anchor the
meaning of various symbols (Weber, 1947, Schneider, 1993, Scott, 1992, Sutton,
Harris, Kaysen & Tobin, 1956).
The revelation highlighted by this theory is the consideration of the self
concepts developed through interaction with others, the influences of culture
and social processes and this system also helps the organization to understand
that the interpretive process is crucial for an organization because it enhance
the aspect of creation of internal meaning. Furthermore, the system considers
the attribute of developing factors that are crucial in understanding the
crucial attributes of external relations because this helps the organization to
relate with other external corporations.
The
attributes of organization theory have the attribute of ascertaining the
elements that are crucial inn the establishment of organizational performance
and they enhance the consideration of increased efficiency and increased
productivity. These are some of the advantages of multi perspective approaches
to the realization of development. Anther significant advantage of the system
is extremely beneficial when the aspects of cultural diversity are considered
and this consideration leads to the attribute of merging the different cultures
that exists in the organization (Simon, 1957). With the consideration of merging the cultures,
management of the organization is enhanced and performance is also enhanced
because increased merging of cultures leads to the consideration of increasing
the attributes of organizational development.
Another
crucial attribute that has necessitated the establishment of multi perspective
approach in the organization is the capacity of the system to offer ideal
communication system for the organization thereby enhancing the attributes of
completion of duties. Visual communication if one of the crucial attributes of
the organization and it is a considered an extremely rich subject area for
exploration and discovery. In this regard, multi perspective has the attribute of
helping the factors concerned to learn about various media in the modern
society that allows the organization and its members to understand the complexities
and the considerations of the organizations. Generally, the aspect of multi
perspective has been highlighted as the sole provider of the consideration for
visual communication and this encourages a multi perspective adoption in the
organization because the organization is based on the consideration of ideal
communication between various parties and departments (Womack,
Jones & Roos, 1990, Wood, 1999).
This consideration is crucial and the implementation of this incentive results
in the enhancement of organizational development. The approach has the
attribute of persuading the participants in the organization to consider
enhancing developmental projects through the consideration of effective
communication.
The
aspect of multiple perceptions in the organizations results to the
consideration of numerous functional indications and these are successfully
demonstrated by the organizations. An example of the organization that has
employed the usage of multiple perspectives is the consideration of Macdonald
and this has enhanced increased efficiency in the attribute of product
development and customer satisfaction. In this regard, the consideration of the
multi perspective should be adopted in the organization to enhance realization
of goals and objectives.
Additionally,
the adoption and usage of multi perspective is normally adopted to act as the
strategic management toll for the organization because managers use this
approach to ascertain the reigning problems in the organization (Kanter,
1989, Dutfield, 1992).
The consideration of using this system has proven to be crucial because it
provides an incentive for the managers to adopt with the am of enhancing
performance of the organization. Certainly, the establishment of this incentive
is immensely beneficial for the organization because it helps the mangers in
identifying the measure that are beneficial for the realization of the goals
and further suggests the aspects of achieving the goals despite the disparities
associated with culture and social differences.
The
system of multi perspective approach may be adopted because of the complexity
of the organization but is has the attribute of ensuring that the organization
incurs increased costs because the attribute of maintaining its provisions are
immense. In this regard, the establishment of this multi perspective approach
is crucial for the organization but it has the consequence of costing the
organization huge sums of monetary resources in order to maintain.
It
is purported that the aspect of too many views from various perspective in the
organization has the consideration of increasing complexities of the
exponentially and this is detrimental for the performance of the organization. Organizational
theory calls for the usage of ideal perspective that has limited effects on the
establishment of organizational performance. The perspectives chosen should not
increase the complexities of the organization. Further more, the consideration
of insufficient links between perspectives and the communication between the
perceivers in the organization have the capacity of reducing integration.
Integration in an organization is extremely crucial for the establishment of
the organization and the attributes of organization theory requires that
organizational attributes establish ideal link to enhance communication between
the perspectives and communication in the organization. Finally, the
consideration of adopting multi perspective approach in the organization has
also been identified as the factor responsible for the aspect of incongruence
that exists between perspectives and perceiver. The organization is considered
as a single entity because the departments and different individuals work
towards the realization of organizational performance. Therefore, the
consideration of incongruence’s is extremely detrimental because it can result
in the emergence of conflicts, confusion and the binding patterns (Pareto,
1935, Ross, 1973). In
the wake of these realities, it is extremely crucial to note that the
attributes of multi perspective are crucial in the enhancement of
organizational performance and the consideration of organizational theory must
enact the measures that will call for the consideration of organizational
development. In this regard, the advantages of multi perspective are immense
and they largely contribute towards the establishment of performance.
References
Boulding, Kenneth E. (1956). General systems theory—The
skeleton of science. Management
Science, 2: 197–208.
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic
imagination: Four essays (trans. Chorale Emerson and
Michael
Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dutfield, M. (1992) The Effective
Management of Contract, Birmingham, United Kingdom:
Dubé, L. and Robey, D. “Software Stories:
Three Cultural Perspectives on the Organizational
Practices of Software Development,” Accounting,
Management & Information Technology (9:4), October 1999, pp. 223-259.
Ford, D. P. Connelly, C. E., and Meister, D.
B. “Information Systems Research and Hofstede's
Culture's Consequences: An uneasy and
Incomplete Partnership,” IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management (50:1),
February 2003, pp. 8-25.
Galliers, R. D., Madon, S., and Rashid, R. “Information
Systems and Culture: Applying ‘Stages
of Growth’ Concepts to Development
Administration,” Information Technology for
Development (8:2), 1998, pp.
89-100.
Kanter, R.M. (1989a) ‘The new managerial
work’, Harvard Business Review Nov/Dec:85–92.
Lash, Scott, and Urry, John (1987). The end
of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pareto, Vilfredo (1935). The Mind and
Society. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Ross, Steven A. (1973). "The Economic
Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problems." American
Economic Review LXII
(May): 134-139.
Simon, Herbert (1957). Administrative
behavior (2nd edn.). New York: Macmillan (first
published
in 1945).
Schneider, Mark A. (1993). Culture and
enchantment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scott, W. Richard (1992). Organizations:
Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd edn.).
Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sutton, F.X., Harris, E., Kaysen, C. and
Tobin, J. (1956) The American Business Creed,
Boston: Harvard University Press.
Shafritz, J. M., Ott, S. J., & Jang, Y. S.
(2011). Classics of Organizational Theory (7th ed.).
Belmont,
Calif.: Wadsworth.
Simon, H.A. (1957) Administrative Behaviour,
2nd edn, New York: Macmillan.
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1959). Course in
general linguistics (trans. Wade Baskin). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D. (1990) The
Machine that Changed the World, New York:
Macmillan.
Wood, S. (1999) ‘Human resource management and
performance’, International Journal of
Management Reviews 1:367–413.
Weber, Max (1947). The theory of social and
economic organization (ed. A. H. Henderson and
Talcott
Parsons). Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press (first published in 1924).
No comments:
Post a Comment