Introduction
Environmental
problems or issues refer to the negative elements of human activities on the
environment. Some of the major environmental issues include pollution, climate
change, resource depletion and environmental degradation. It is currently
evident that human beings are living unsustainably due to the environmental
problems. In order for this to happen, natural resources must be used in such a
rate that it is possible to replenish. This has not been happening especially
in the developing nations. This has caused unprecedented poverty in these countries
and taken a toll on lives in these nations. In the past decade about 2.4
billion individuals were affected by climate-related disasters, as compared to
about 1.7 billion people in the previous decade. The cost of responding to
these disasters has gone up tenfold from the year 1992 to the year 2008. There
have been destructive floods, serious topical storms and draughts.
Unfortunately these effects are felt more in the developing nations. The
question remains whether it is enough to blame the poorer and developing
nations for their predicaments in as far as environmental issues are concerned.
Some researchers in this area have argued that the real cause of poverty and
environmental issues in the developing nations is rarely discussed. It is the
richer and developed nations that are basically to blame for the most
predicaments facing the developing nations (Gregory, Johnston,
Pratt, Watts and Whatmore 2009). This paper
discusses the causes of environmental issues from the perspective of the
economic relationships between developing countries and the rich world, and
goes further to recommend changes in this relationship.
The relationship and environmental issues
The developing
nations have always used globalization, capitalism and cultural factors to have
control over the developing nations. Such control has been cultural economic or
political, by promoting their own culture media and language in the developing
world. Behind the interconnections that are promised by globalization lie
international decisions, practices and policies. All these are basically
driven, influenced and formulated by the richer and more powerful nations.
These are leaders of the economically developed nations or other global players
like the multinational companies, international institutions and powerful
individuals (Ferraro 1996). This capitalism has produced a rigid system that is
the international division of labor that favors the developed world at the
expense of the developing nations. The dependent nations provide cheap
agricultural products, cheap mineral and labor and also play the role of the
repositories of surplus capital, manufactured products and obsolescent
technologies. This orients the economies of the dependent nations toward the
outside. Goods, money, services do flow to these nations, but the allotment of
these resources is on the basis of the economic interests of the developed
nations, which are the dominant states. The division of labor is the basic
explanation of poverty and environmental issues in the developing nations
(Chrisman and Parry 2000).
Economic
development in the industrialized or developed nations does not necessarily
cause development in the developed nations. As a matter of fact, it has been
suggested through economic research that economic activities in the developed
nations cause serious economic, social and environmental problems in the
developing nations. Developed nations import raw materials from the developing
nations from which they generate finished products. The finished products from
the raw materials are sold back to the developing nations. The value that is
added to the primary products in the process of creating the finished products
makes them to have a higher cost than the primary products. This means that the
developing nations would not earn sufficient for their export earnings to cater
for their imports. Resources are therefore extracted from the developing nations
to cater for the economic development of the wealthier nations. From this point
of view, it can be argued that the environmental problems and poverty in the
developing nations can be blamed in the way they are integrated in the global
system (Chrisman and Parry 2000).
Another major
factor behind environmental issues is development of multinational companies in
the developing nations. These companies are said to enrich very few people in
the developing world while they cause environmental, humanitarian and
ecological devastation to the populace in the developing nations. Multinational
companies are international companies with branches in other countries most of
which are the developing countries. It is the developed nations that are able
to build up this multinationals. In the free market made possible by
globalizations, these companies are allowed to be established and market their
products in any country around the world. The issue arises in that it is easy
for the developed nations to set up companies in developing countries, and use
labor and other resources from the host country, while the developing nations
are not economically equipped to do so. The result of the multinationals being
developed in the developing nations is argued to be unsustainable development
as well as continuous underdevelopment (Gregory, Johnston,
Pratt, Watts and Whatmore 2009). This can be
explained by use of dependency theory. The establishment of multinational
companies in the developing nations causes a dependency that cultivates the
host nations as sources of cheap labor and raw products for their companies.
They restrict the access to developed production technologies and techniques from
the developing nations to develop their economies. Another environmental issue
posed by these companies is pollution, the greatest factor behind climate
change and global warming. Majority of the multinational companies established
in the developing nations are manufacturing companies whose carbon emissions
are a fact. These companies are one of the greatest factors behind carbon emissions
in the developing nations (Chrisman and Parry 2000).
International
financial organizations are also playing a role in the problems facing the
developing nations. They have the choice to provide or refuse grant (especially
the ones financing unplayable Third World Debt) is one of the things leading to
higher rates of poverty in the developing nations. This is an effective form of
control that makes them have lack of means of production for sustainable development.
Some of the international financial organizations that have been criticized for
this in the past are the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These
organizations have argued that for a nation to qualify for the loans, and other
forms of financial aid, they have to take some steps that are favorable to the
interests of the international financial institutions. Some of these measures
though favorable to the organizations are detrimental to the economies of the
developing nations (Bruce 1994). The structural adjustments affect the
developing nations by increasing instead of decreasing poverty and
environmental issues in the developing countries. It has been argued that the
current economic arrangements permit some cartels to control and exploit poorer
countries by fostering debts. This leads to some governments in the developing
nations to give monopolies and concessions to international companies in
exchange to consolidation of control and financial bribes. Such multinationals
use the power in such a way that affects the natural resources of the poorer
country. In various cases, most of the money that is loaned to the developing
nations is returned to the favored international company. The foreign loans are
thus subsidies to companies of the loaning state. Some of the international
organizations that have been blamed for engaging in this kind of
neo-imperialism include the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Group of Eight, the
World Bank, and the World Economic Forum. Some of the developed nations like
the United States
are argued to be involved, as claimed in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
by John Perkins (Perkins 2004).
Some authors have
argued that the developing nations, especially in Africa
currently pay more money per annum in servicing their debts to the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund than they get in loans from these
organizations. This mostly deprives the populations in these countries of their
necessities. This is the kind of dependency that enables the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund to enforce Structural Adjustment Programs upon
these countries. These adjustments that basically consist of privatization
plans result in deterioration of education health and generally low living
standards. The opponents of these international monetary organizations have
carried out studies as to the impact of policies such as devaluations by the
International Monetary Fund (Reuveny 2007). This policy demands devaluations of
currency. The critics have argued that the international monetary fund wants
these currency devaluations as a provision for refinancing loans. The
organization also insists that the loan be paid back in dollars or currencies
from the other First World nations against
which the currency of the least developed country has been devalued. This
increases the debt by a percentage of the devalued currency. This is a means of
keeping these countries under perpetual debt and impoverishment. In this case, environmental
problems persist as they deplete the remaining natural resources to cater for
their basic necessities. Poor people in the developing nations who cannot mean
their needs through purchasing are forced to use common property or natural
resources for fuel and food. The problem here is not due to poverty, but due to
international policies that are contributing to this poverty (Mohamed 2011).
Recommended changes
Provision of
capital for the developed nations to start up their own industries and stop
relying on the industrialized nations and multinationals for finished products
is one of the ways that the environmental problems in the developing nations
can be dealt with. This means that the poorer countries will stop exporting a
lot of their primary products and depending on the industrialized nations for
finished products. One important source of this finding should come from the
developed nations, which are the major cause of the problem (Shannon
1996). The relationship between the developed and developing nations should not
always be such that the developed nations are benefiting at the expense of the
developing nations. The developing nations should also be in a position to
benefit economically from the relationship, which is not the case at the
present. The developed nations as well as the international financial
organizations should fund development projects in the developing countries. The
developed nations should be philanthropic enough to provide direct aid and
technological assistance to the developing nations. The developed nations should
also develop renewable technology and find means to transfer these economies to
the developing nations. The problem seems to begin with the economic
development of the developed nations and they should be the ones on the
forefront in solving it (Mohamed 2011).
Another solution
for the poorer nations is to develop projects of import substitution in order
to avoid buying the finished products from the industrialized nations. The
developing nations would still trade on the primary products on the international
market, but have their foreign exchange reserves stop purchasing their finished
products from the developed nations. The developing nations should seek to
pursue policies that will provide self-reliance. Divergent from the
neo-classical systems that are enforced by the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund, greater integration into the international market is not
essentially a beneficial choice for the developing nations. Sometimes, this
policy perspective is seen as support of a policy of autarky. These policies
have failed revealing that they are not good choices for the developing
nations. Self-reliance policies should be seen as supporting policies of
controlled interactions with the global economy. The developing nations should
seek to support policies and global interactions that support the improvement of
the economic and social welfare of their populations (Kacowicz 2007).
The industrialized
nations should push measures that could be helpful for the developing nations.
Such measures include giving the developing nations more power over the
economic policy, funding more development-oriented technologies and opening up
labor markets. The idea of a free market that will reward the participants is
misleading and cause of more problems for the developing nations. The current
policies do not pay attention to the issue of distribution of wealth. Their concern
is on effective and efficient production and presumes that the market will
allot the rewards of effective and efficient production in a rational and fair
manner. This is a condition that is not favorable to the developing nations and
should therefore be changed, in such a way that the allocation of resources is
not on the basis of production in a free market. This is because the market
alone cannot be sufficient distributive means (Kacowicz 2007).
Another way that
the developing nations can be allowed to develop is by canceling the debts owed
to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. It is possible for the
countries to attain sustainable development without having to pay more money
than they get from the international financial organizations. The ultimate
objective of most of the international financial organizations is reduction of
poverty, especially in the developing nations. In the past most of the
development projects and policies that have been encouraged by the
international organizations have led to more poverty and environmental
problems. This means that the international financial organizations need to
devise other policies that are beneficial to the developing nations. As earlier
noted, the problems of the developing nations can only be understood in working
with these nations directly (Reuveny 2007). It is not possible for the international
financial agencies to develop policies and programs that are targeted toward
developing nations without working with these nations. In the past, most
problems affecting the developing nations have been discussed by the developed
nations and measures suggested to deal with the problems by these nations. This
is mostly what has led to failure in these programs and policies. This calls
for change in how the issues are discussed and how solutions are suggested.
Involvement of developing nations in the discussions is the way to go. Additionally,
the recommended solutions should be backed with research evidence on their
applicability and effectiveness in solving the environmental problems in the
developing nations. Carrying out research is the only way of ensuring that the
developed policies and programs do not cause worse problems to the populations
in the developing nations (Preece 2009).
Addressing
environmental problems and other issues that affect life in the developing
nations will only be effective if they are addressed from these countries’
perspective. This is through active involvement of the countries that are
affected by these problems. It is important that most of the conventions held
on environmental and related issues be held in the developing nations in order
to engage them. It is not enough for the developed nations to address the issue
of climate change in their own world while their industries are moving to the
developed nations and taking their operations with them. They carry on the
environmental degradation and carbon emissions in these countries. This means
that if the problem is to be adequately addressed, there is need to find ways
to mitigate emissions and environmental degradation by the multinational
corporations (Reuveny 2007). Additionally development of the multinational
corporations should not be done in such a way that benefits the home countries
only, while causing more problems to the host countries. This has always been
the case and need to be changed. International policies should be developed
such that they protect the developing nations from the devastating effects of
these companies. Failure to comply with the developed policies and protection
measures should lead to dismissal from the host countries. This way, the
developing nations will be protected from the economic selfishness of the
developed world (Preece 2009).
Conclusion
This paper
discusses the causes of environmental issues from the perspective of the
economic relationships between developing countries and the rich world, and
goes further to recommend changes in this relationship. Problems facing the
developing nations such as poverty and environmental issues are normally blamed
on these countries. People looking into these issues have failed to put the
blame where it belongs. Only a few authors have looked at the role played by
their economic relationship with the developed nations, which is the main
contributing factor. Economic development in the industrialized or developed
nations does not necessarily cause development in the developed nations. They
take up resources and primary resources from the developing nations at a low
price, selling the finished products to these countries at a higher place. Other
factors in this relationship that have caused problems to the developing
nations are the development of multinationals with developing nations as hosts
and the policies and programs designed by the international financial
organizations such as the world bank and the international monetary fund. The
only solution to environmental problems and poverty in the developing nations
is a change in their economic relationship with the developed nations. The
policies developed that favor the developed nations over the developing nations
should be changed, provision of financial and technical support is necessary
and canceling their debts are among the factors that will contribute to
changing the situation in the developed nations.
Reference List:
Bruce R. 1994, Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, Environmental Impoverishment and
the
Crisis of Development, Earthscan
Publications Ltd., London,
Chrisman, L. & Parry, B. (ed.)
2000. Postcolonial theory and criticism English Association,
Cambridge
Ferraro, V. 1996. Dependency
Theory: An Introduction, Mount Holyoke
College, South
Hadley,
MA
Gregory, D., Johnston,
R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. J. & Whatmore, S.
2009. The Dictionary of
Human Geography. 5th. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.
Kacowicz, A. M. 2007.
Globalization, Poverty, and the North–South Divide. International
Studies Review 9(4).
Mohamed, I. 2011. An Overview of Economic Patterns of Partnerships between Developing and
Rich Countries with Special Reference to USA and Sudan, International
Trade Journal, 3(70).
Perkins, J. 2004. Confessions of
an Economic Hit Man, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San
Francisco, CA.
Preece, J. 2009. Lifelong learning
and development: a perspective from the ‘South’ Compare: A
Journal of Comparative and International
Education 39(5)
Reuveny, R. X. 2007, The
North–South Divide and International Studies: A Symposium.
International Studies Review 9(4).
Shannon, T. 1996. An
introduction to the world-system perspective. Second Edition. Westview
Press, Boulder, CO
No comments:
Post a Comment